[ad_1]
The US economy shrank for a second consecutive quarter, meeting one of the common criteria for a technical recession and complicating the Federal Reserve’s push to stamp out soaring inflation with a string of aggressive rate rises.
Data published by the commerce department on Thursday showed gross domestic product fell by 0.9 per cent on an annualised basis in the second quarter, or a 0.2 per cent fall from the previous quarter. This follows first-quarter GDP data showing the US economy shrank by 1.6 per cent in the first three months of 2022.
Back-to-back quarterly contractions meet the technical definition of a recession, although the US relies on an determination by a group of researchers at the National Bureau of Economic Research who look at a broader range of factors.
The White House has maintained that the US economy remains strong and is not currently in a recession, with Treasury secretary Janet Yellen saying earlier this week she that would “be amazed” if the NBER declared it was.
But two consecutive quarters of negative growth will nonetheless heap further pressure on US President Joe Biden, who is contending with low approval ratings and has repeatedly touted a strong economy as one of the major achievements of his administration.
Shortly after the data were published, Biden said: “It’s no surprise that the economy is slowing down as the Federal Reserve acts to bring down inflation.
“But even as we face historic global challenges, we are on the right path and we will come through this transition stronger and more secure. Our job market remains historically strong.
In a press conference on Wednesday after the Fed raised interest rates by 0.75 percentage points for the second month in the role, chair Jay Powell said he did not believe the US was in a recession. He pointed to strength in the economy, including in the labour market, but noted that growth would need to slow and the labour market must cool down in order to tame inflation.
The labour market has not yet shown significant signs of weakness, with the US adding jobs at a healthy pace averaging about 380,000 a month over the past three months. The unemployment rate also remains at a historically low level of 3.6 per cent, just shy of its pre-pandemic level.
Nevertheless, two quarters of negative growth in a row rippled through debt markets. The two-year Treasury yield, which moves with interest rate expectations, plunged, suggesting investors were betting the Fed might have to slow its pace of interest rate increases.
Despite the slump in GDP, personal consumption, which offers insight into the health of the US consumer, grew by 1 per cent in the second quarter, compared with growth of 1.8 per cent in the first three months of the year.
The biggest drag on second-quarter GDP was a drop in business inventories, which wiped 2 percentage points off the headline figure.
Some economists believe this was a lingering effect of last year’s pandemic economy, when business inventories surged as shelves were restocked after Covid-19-related supply chain bottlenecks started to ease. The drop in inventory investment also reflected the damping impact the Fed’s interest rate rises have had on business investment, economists said.
“The inventory data have been very volatile for the past two years. Inventory management has been very difficult, partly because of the supply chain problem and partly because demand for goods was red-hot,” Guggenheim Partners economist Brian Smedley said.
The hefty rate increases implemented by the central bank in recent months have begun to put the brakes on the economy, and market participants are watching closely to see if this rapid tightening will tip the US into an official recession.
However, The data are unlikely to change the Fed’s calculus about the path forward for policy now, economists said.
“GDP is one measure of economic activity, but as complete as it may seem . . . the labour market is going to be the best gauge as to whether we’re really headed towards a recession and whether businesses are really cutting back on hiring,” EY-Parthenon economist Gregory Daco said.
“I don’t think the GDP print would or should influence the Fed,” AllianceBernstein economist Eric Winograd said.
[ad_2]
Source link
Comments are closed.